KAJIAN KRITIS TERHADAP TEORI SUMBER-SUMBER: TINJAUAN JULIUS WELHAUSEN (DOCUMENTARY HYPOTHESIS)

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Apr 13, 2026
https://doi.org/10.55076/rerum.v6i1.590
Download
PDF
Statistic
Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): RERUM: The Journal of Biblical Practice

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Christon Nababan
Sekolah Tinggi Teologi HKBP Pematangsiantar, Sumatera Utara
Wilda Prianty Simanjuntak
Sekolah Tinggi Teologi HKBP Pematangsiantar, Sumatera Utara

Abstract

The Pentateuch contains the first five books in the Old Testament, namely Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy. These five books, according to the view of the layman, especially by the Batak, are written by Moses because indirectly the Bible (the Bible in Batak) writes the name of this book with 1 Moses to 5 Moses. The research method is carried out through the descriptive qualitative method, namely with literature, both through journals and even books written by Julius Wellhausen himself and not forgetting the books of other theologians. These five books were not only written by Moses but according to Julius Wellhausen there are five groups in the writing of this book, namely Yahwis (Y), Elohis (E), Deuteronomists (D), and Priests (P) where this plays a role in the process of canonization of these five books which lasts even centuries until the Pentateuch itself is formed.


 

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Nababan, Christon, and Wilda Prianty Simanjuntak. 2026. “KAJIAN KRITIS TERHADAP TEORI SUMBER-SUMBER: TINJAUAN JULIUS WELHAUSEN (DOCUMENTARY HYPOTHESIS)”. RERUM: Journal of Biblical Practice 6 (1):113-29. https://doi.org/10.55076/rerum.v6i1.590.

References

  1. Blum E. The Decalogue and the Composition History of the Pentateuch. 11th ed. Vol. 1. 1 1. The Pentateuch: International Perspectives on Current Research, 2011.
  2. H. M. Orlinsky ?. ?. ?????????. “ORIGEN’S TETRAPLA — A SCHOLARLY FICTION?” Word Union of Jewish Studies 1, no. 1 (1947): 173.
  3. Hotma Parulian, Sitorus. “PENGUKUHAN IDENTITAS KESATUAN ‘BANGSA’ ISRAEL.” Cultivation, 1, vol. 3 (Juli 2019): 13.
  4. J. Blommendaal. Pengantar Kepada Perjanjian Lama. 15 ed. BPK Gunung Mulia, 2008, 1989.
  5. Jan Christian Gertz, Angelika Berlejung. Purwa Pustaka. 1 ed. 1. BPK Gunung Mulia, 2017.
  6. Jean d'Astruc. Conjectures sur les mémoires originaux, dont il parait que Mosye s'est servi pour composer le livre de la Genèse. 173M.
  7. Kaseh, Novalin. “ANALISIS KISAH PENCIPTAAN SUMBER Y DALAM KEJADIAN 2:4b-25 DARI PERSPEKTIF EKOLOGI.” BONA FIDE: Jurnal Teologi dan Pendidikan Kristen 3, no. 2 (2022): 174–92. https://doi.org/10.46558/bonafide.v3i2.118.
  8. Kristiawan, Ragil. “Pesan Teologis Penggunaan Nama Gabungan Allah ???? ???????? (El-Shaddai) dalam Pentateukh.” Jurnal Ilmiah Tafsir Alkitab 1, no. 2 (2024): 93–109. https://doi.org/10.69668/juita.v1i2.10.
  9. Kusumastuti, Adhi, dkk. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Lembaga Pendidikan Sukarno Pressindo, t.t.
  10. Lewis, Joe O. “Book Review: I. Biblical Studies: Das Ueberlieferungsgeschichtliche Problem Des Pentateuch.” Review & Expositor 75, no. 3 (1978): 433–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/003463737807500311.
  11. Martin Noth, A History of Pentateuchal Traditions (1948). A History of Pentateuchal Traditions. Englewood Cliffs, N.J. Prentice-Hall 1972, 1972.
  12. Maxsi Tupamahu. “Konsep Kovenan dalam Perjanjian Lama: Analisis Kitab Pentateukh dari Perspektif Historis dan Teologis.” JUITAK: Jurnal Ilmiah Teologi dan Pendidikan Kristen 3, no. 4 (2025): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.61404/juitak.v3i4.437.
  13. Meyer, Esias E. “Dating the Priestly text in the pre-exilic period: Some remarks about anachronistic slips and other obstacles.” Verbum et Ecclesia 31, no. 1 (2010): 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v31i1.423.
  14. Nicholson, Ernest W. The Pentateuch in the Twentieth Century: The Legacy of Julius Wellhausen. Clarendon, 2002.
  15. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257836.001.0001.
  16. Reni Triposa. “METODE KRITIK ALKITAB JULIUS WELLHAUSEN: TANTANGAN DAN PELUANG BAGI TEOLOGI KRISTEN.” Jurnal Teologi dan Pengembangan Pelayanan 14, no. 1 (2024): 49–67. https://doi.org/10.51828/td.v14i1.342.
  17. Robert Alter, John H. Hayes. Pentateuchal Criticism. Dictionary of Biblical Interpretation, 1999.
  18. Samongilailai, Aseng Yulias, dan Barnabas Ludji. “Book Review: Sejarah Pertama Alkitab: Dari Eden hingga Kerajaan Daud Berdasarkan Sumber Y: Book Review: The Bible’s First History: From Eden to the Court of David with the Yahwist.” PASCA?: Jurnal Teologi dan Pendidikan Agama Kristen 17, no. 2 (2021): 203–8. https://doi.org/10.46494/psc.v17i2.143.
  19. Schmid, Konrad, Thomas B. Dozeman, and Baruch J. Schwartz, ed. The Pentateuch. Mohr Siebeck, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1628/978-3-16-151750-1.
  20. Th.C.Vriezen. Agama Israel Kuno. 5. ed. BPK Gunung Mulia, t.t.
  21. Van Seters, John. The Yahwist: A Historian of Israelite Origins. Penn State University Press, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781575068640.
  22. (W. de Wette,. A Critical and Historical Introduction to the Canonical Scriptures of the Old Testament. 12 ed. Vol. 02. t.t.
  23. W.S. Lasor, D. A. Hubbard. Pengantar perjanjian Lama 1. 12 ed. BPK Gunung Mulia, 1997, 1998.
  24. Zhang, Shuai. “Rewriting the Torah: The Response of the Deuteronomists and Returnees to the Disasters.” Religions 15, no. 6 (2024): 747. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15060747.