Hierarchical and Polycentric Leadership in the Church on Congregation Participation

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Apr 13, 2026
https://doi.org/10.55076/rerum.v6i1.593
Download
PDF
Statistic
Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): RERUM: The Journal of Biblical Practice

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Frederich Oscar Lambertus Lontoh
Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Moriah, Tangerang

Abstract

Abstract
The church leadership structure is a critical factor influencing congregational involvement. The traditional hierarchical model, which centers on a single authoritative figure, is now widely questioned for its effectiveness in empowering the active participation of all members of the body of Christ. As an alternative, a polycentric (distributed) leadership model that distributes authority based on gifts and functions is increasingly being adopted. However, claims regarding the relative effectiveness of the two models in encouraging congregational participation require systematic study. This study uses a qualitative comparative literature review method. The primary data sources consist of scientific journal articles. The analysis was conducted thematically to identify, compare, and synthesize findings regarding the definition, implementation, and impact of each model on indicators of congregational participation. The study reveals fundamental differences in the philosophy and impact of the two models. Hierarchical leadership tends to create efficiency in decision-making and maintain doctrinal stability, but often limits participation to the implementation of predetermined programs. Conversely, polycentric leadership is significantly more effective in encouraging initiative, creativity, and a sense of ownership among congregations toward ministry. Its success depends heavily on a culture of mutual trust, a clear disciplinary system, and a commitment to nurturing gifts. However, the polycentric model also faces challenges such as potential conflict, slow decision-making, and the need for more intensive coordination. This study concludes that there is no “one size fits all” model. Hierarchical leadership may remain relevant in contexts that require high stability and uniformity, while polycentric leadership excels in building empowering and adaptive communities. The practical implication for the church is the need for a contextual hybrid leadership design that takes the principle of gift distribution from the polycentric model without completely disregarding the clarity of accountability from hierarchical structures. Further research is needed to explore this hybrid model in various denominational and cultural settings.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Lontoh, Frederich Oscar Lambertus. 2026. “Hierarchical and Polycentric Leadership in the Church on Congregation Participation”. RERUM: Journal of Biblical Practice 6 (1):149-76. https://doi.org/10.55076/rerum.v6i1.593.

References

  1. Barton, R. H. (2012). Part 1: Beyond Teamwork: Spiritual Community at the Leadership Level. Https://Transformingcenter.Org/.
  2. Bevans, S. (2018). A Theology Of Leadership, Not Management: Trinitarian Mission And Baptismal Discipleship. Annales Missiologici Posnanienses, (22), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.14746/amp.2017.22.1
  3. Biri, S. (2024). Model Kepemimpinan Servant Leadership Melalui Teladan Yesus Dalam Konteks Modern.
  4. Borong, R. P. (2019). Kepemimpinan Dalam Gereja Sebagai Pelayanan. Voice of Wesley: Jurnal Ilmiah Musik Dan Agama. https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newLDR_56.htm
  5. Braithwaite, M., & Handley, J. W. (2022, September). What Is Polycentric Mission Leadership? Https://Lausanne.Org.
  6. Clowney, E. (1995). The Church. www.rtf-usa.com
  7. Franklin, K., & Niemandt, N. (2016). Polycentrism in the missio Dei. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 72(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v72i1.3145
  8. Gibbs, E. (2005). Leadership Next: Changing Leaders in a Changing Cult.
  9. Grimes, M. A., & Bennett III, R. H. (2017). Christ-centered leadership: God-honoring leadership for committed Christians. Journal of Biblical Integration in Business, 20(1), 24–35. https://cbfa-jbib.org/index.php/jbib/article/view/457
  10. Gunawan, A. (2013). Mengelola Konflik Dalam Gereja. Jurnal Sola Gracia.
  11. Guyette, F. (2011). The Literature of Ecclesiology: A Ten-Year Retrospective Prologue: Avery Dulles and Models of the Church. Ournal of the American Theological Library Association.
  12. Hammond, G. (2021). The Moses Model for Church Government? Https://Www.Bethelpres.Com/.
  13. Handley, J. W. (2021, May). Polycentrism as the New Leadership Paradigm. Https://Lausanne.Org/.
  14. Handley, J. W. (2022). What is Polycentric Leadership? Polycentric Leadership: a New Theory for Global Leadership.
  15. Handley Jr, J. W. (2025). A leadership model for a polarized world. Https://Christianleadershipalliance.Org.
  16. Harefa, D. (2024). Suatu Kajian Nilai-Nilai Gaya Servant Leadership dalam Ajaran Yesus Kristus. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Kristen, 4, 16–24.
  17. Hasiholan, A. M. (2023). Polisentris perkembangan Pentakostalisme: Sebuah kajian retrospektif dari gereja abad kuno hingga pertengahan. KURIOS, 9(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.30995/kur.v9i1.592
  18. Hastings, A. (2003). From Agbebi to Diangienda: Independency and Prophetism. Oxford Academic.
  19. Heintje, B., Kobstan, S. E., Th, M., & Pd, M. (2023). Kepemimpinan Gereja Yang Kolaboratif Dan Adaptif Dalam Mengatasi Kesenjangan Antara Generasi Tua Dan Generasi Muda Di Era Digital. 5(1), 2460–5603.
  20. Hirsch, A., & Catchim, T. (2012). The Permanent Revolution. Jossey-Bass.
  21. Huizing, Russel. L. (2011). Bringing Christ To The Table Of Leadership: Moving Towards A Theology Of Leadership.
  22. Lee, A. (2021). A Theology Of Christian Leadership: A Continual Journey Of From Character Transformation To Spirit-Led Action. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=1065989.
  23. Leithart, P. (2016). Trinity in Theory and Practice. In Theopolis Institute.
  24. Lontoh, F. O. L. (2025). Kepemimpinan Kristen. Historie Media.
  25. Lontoh, F. O. L., & Wibowo, D. A. (2025). An examination of Jesus’ situational leadership approach. Verbum et Ecclesia, 46(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v46i1.3540
  26. Mercadal, T. M. (2021). Hierarchical Organizational Structure. Https://Www.Ebsco.Com/.
  27. Morales, G. (2024). Rincian Lengkap Struktur Organisasi Hirarkis. Www.Mindonmap.Com.
  28. Nama, B. (2024, May 8). Developing Leadership Formation for Base Christian Communities in the Brazilian Context: Toward a more Communal and Synodal Church. Https://Rim.Ir.Atla.Com/.
  29. Nugraha Tjandraputra, E., Rantung, D. A., Naibaho, L., & Boiliu, N. I. (2023). Manajemen Pendidikan Agama Kristen dalam Konflik di Gereja dan Keluarga. Jurnal Regula Fidei. https://regional.kompas.com/read/2021/10/14/231420478/murid-sd-dianiaya-4-orang-temannya-hingga-
  30. Ogunkolati, K. (2024). Mobilization of lay persons for Christian mission: a case study of selected Pentecostal churches in southwest Nigeria. Middlesex University.
  31. Olajide, G. O. (2025). An Exploration of Moses’ Leadership Style and Governance in Contemporary Nigeria. Pharos Journal of Theology, (106.4). https://doi.org/10.46222/pharosjot.106.4013
  32. Palma, P. J. (2022). Grassroots Pentecostalism in Brazil and the United States?: migrations, missions, and mobility . Cham, Switzerland?: Palgrave Macmillan.
  33. Roxburgh, A. J., & Romanuk, F. (2006). The Missional Leader. Equipping Your Church to Reach a Changing World. Jossey-Bass.
  34. Saleem, F., Zhang, Y. Z., Gopinath, C., & Adeel, A. (2020). Impact of Servant Leadership on Performance: The Mediating Role of Affective and Cognitive Trust. SAGE Open, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019900562
  35. Siagian, H., Munthe, P., Tinggi, S., & Sabda, T. A. (2021). Pengaruh Pengorganisasian Pucuk Pimpinan Gereja Terhadap Episkopal Sinodal Gereja HKI. 1(2), 65–73.
  36. Sutrisno, A., Suwandi, M., Suyadi, Y. N., Tinggi, S., Anugrah, T., & Surabaya, I. (2025). Moses’ Leadership in Exodus 18:13-27 as the Basis of Management at Kanafero Group Yogyakarta. Indonesian Journal Of Christian Education And Theology (Ijcet), 4(2). https://doi.org/10.55927/ijcet.v4i2.85
  37. Tangen, K. I. (2018). Leadership As Participation In Christ: Paul’s Theology Of Leadership In The Letter To The Philippians. Journal of Biblical Perspectives in Leadership.
  38. WCC. (2007). Nigerian Methodist leader heads inter-church group charged with re-envisioning a “polycentric” ecumenical movement. Www.Oikoumene.Org.
  39. Wilson, R. R. (2022). A Polycentric Alternative to Hierarchical Church Leadership.
  40. Wright, N. T. (2006). Simply Christian?: why Christianity makes sense. HarperSanFrancisco.